You are here:   Home Section Blog Hunger Single Worst Food/Beverage in the World: 20 oz. Soda:
Single Worst Food/Beverage in the World: 20 oz. Soda: PDF Print E-mail
Written by Richard L. Lipman M.D.   
Monday, 23 March 2009 23:42
The most  fattening food/beverage is the 20 oz. bottle of soda. A single soda a day for a year  = weight gain of 25 lbs.
1/4 cup of sugar in 20 oz coke

Many researchers believe that if the 20 oz. bottle of soda was eliminated that’s all that would be needed to stop the runaway  obesity problem.  Many people either forget or don't realize how many extra calories they consume in a single 20 oz. bottle of any regular soda:  250 calories and 15 teaspoons sugar. Drinking only 1 a day for a year can  result in a 25 lb. weight gain.


High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) not the cause of obesity:
In 2004 a series of scientific articles blamed  obesity on high fructose corn syrup that became the major sweetener in soft drinks and many other foods. They cited evidence that fructose was only metabolized by the liver which turned the fructose into fat.  Furthermore, HFCS lacked any effect on satiety. It became nutritional dogma  that sugar was healthy, and high-fructose corn syrup was not.
More
recent evidence indicates that this is not true, the metabolic effects of HFCS are minimal and beverages sweetened with HFCS are no more fattening than other beverages with similar amount of sugar.

Mexican and European Sodas Have no HFCS:
One of the interesting side points made by many scientists is that pure cane sugar is used in Mexico and Europe.  The incidence of obesity in these countries is approaching that in the US where HFCS is used almost exclusively.

Most of the studies compared HFCS with pure fructose:
HFSC is 50% fructose and 50% table sugar (white table sugar, which scientists call sucrose, is made from sugar cane or sugar beets and consists of 50% fructose and 50% glucose.)
Recent studies show all sugars are the same. This year more than five scientific studies found no link between HFCS and obesity.

Is High Fructose Corn Syrup the "Devil?"
One paper was written by Barry Popkin, a co-author on the original 2004 paper, who said
"It doesn't appear that when you consume high-fructose corn syrup, you have any different effect on appetite than if you consume any other sugar," he says. The kind of high-fructose syrup that sweetens almost all soft drinks in the USA is made from corn and consists of 55% fructose and 42% glucose, both of which are slightly different sugars. "People think high-fructose corn syrup is the devil and table sugar is natural," but that's not necessarily true, says Elizabeth Parks, a professor of clinical nutrition at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas.
"So far  the research appears to show that sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup are not that different," Parks says. She believes there's some evidence that the way they are metabolized in the liver is different, but not in a significant way.
If it’s not the kind of sugar in sodas, what is it?
It’s the total amount of sugar and thus the calories: 15 teaspoons of sugar-250 calories whether it's from table sugar, HFCS, brown sugar or raw sugar.


What is  Pepsi’s  new "Natural" Soda?
Pepsi released a “natural” soda, the sweetener is 15 teaspoons of  white sugar, the calories are still 250 calories.  It is natural or are we just fooling ourselves?

Conclusion: Pay attention to the calories and stop losing focus on the type of sugar.

Dr. Victor Fulgoni writes a conclusion to the  annual American Society for Nutrition Public Information Committee symposium for 2007 titled "High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS): Everything You Wanted to Know, But Were Afraid to Ask .... "served as a platform to address the controversy surrounding HFCS. Speakers from academia and industry came together to provide up-to-date information on this food ingredient. The proceedings from the symposium covered 1) considerable background on what HFCS is and why it is used as a food ingredient, 2) the contribution HFCS makes to consumers' diets, and 3) the latest research on the metabolic effects of HFCS. The data presented indicated that HFCS is very similar to sucrose, being  55% fructose and 45% glucose, and thus, not surprisingly, few metabolic differences were found comparing HFCS and sucrose. That said, HFCS does contribute to added sugars and calories, and those concerned with managing their weight should be concerned about calories from beverages and other foods, regardless of HFCS content."


Lenny R. Vartanian, PhD, Marlene B. Schwartz, PhD and Kelly D. Brownell, PhD from the Department of Psychology at Yale University, sumarized the state of knowlege concerning obesity and the consumption of soft drinks in a metanalysis of 88 studies from around the world in the American Journal of Public Health in 2007. Here is a short excerpt from that study:


"Intake of soft drinks and added sugars, particularly high fructose corn syrup, has increased coincident with rising body weights and energy intakes in the population of theUnited States. Yearly US per capita consumption of nondiet soft drinks rose 86% between 1970 and 1997 alone (22 gal [83.6 L] vs 41 gal). The prevalence of obesity increased 112% during that approximate time....One of the most consistent and powerful findings is the link between soft drink intake and increased energy consumption. Fully 10 of 12 cross-sectional studies, 5 of 5 longitudinal studies, and all 4 of the long-term experimental studies examined showed that energy intake rises when soft drink consumption increases. The effect sizes for these studies, respectively, were 0.13, 0.24, and 0.30. The available literature also supports the observation that people do not adequately compensate for the added energy they consume in soft drinks with their intake of other foods and consequently increase their intake of sugar and total energy. Noteworthy are findings from several studies that soft drink intake is associated with a higher level of energy consumption than can be accounted for by the soft drinks themselves. These findings raise the possibility that soft drinks increase hunger, decrease satiety, or simply calibrate people to a high level of sweetness that generalizes to preferences in other foods. Bray et al. noted that the average American older than 2 years consumes 553 kJ (132 kcal) per day from high fructose corn syrup (the sole sweetener in US soft drinks) and that intake of this sweetener rose 1000% between 1970 and 1990. These authors proposed that fructose is digested, absorbed, and metabolized differently than glucose in ways that favor de novo lipogenesis and do not stimulate insulin secretion or enhance the production of leptin, both afferent signals in the regulation of food intake and body weight."

Read more on soft drinks, artifical sweeteners and other sugary beverages

Read More on Artificial Sweeteners,
Energy Drink
s,
Sports Drinks
Sugar in Soft Drinks
"The Sin Tax:" How to Switch to Diet Soft Drinks,
Sugary Beverages Worse than High Calorie Food



Last Updated on Thursday, 30 April 2009 22:36
 
Richard Lipman - The 100-Calorie Secret
Download The 100 Calorie Secret E-Book

e-mail Dr. Lipman

Event Calendar

<<  May 2012  >>
 Mo  Tu  We  Th  Fr  Sa  Su 
   1  2  3  4  5  6
  7  8  910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   
Richard Lipman - Chat With The Doctor Online For Free

Follow Me on Twitter!

Follow me on twitter